MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Sumit Nagal [171st] vs Jakub Mensik [23rd] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Nagal 1 - 0 Mensik

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Mensik winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Mensik was at the Helsinki Challenger, 08-11-2023, Second, I.hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 7-5 6-2.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Sumit Nagal 1
Jakub Mensik 0
Nagal vs Mensik H2H Profile
Nagal Stats Mensik
44% (8-10) YTD Win/Loss 68% (17-8)
1 Head-to-Head 0
171 Ranking 23
68 Highest Rank 23
27 Age 19
R Plays -
15 Titles 7
59% (339-233) Career Total W/L 63% (133-78)
$534,520 Career Prize Money $2,617,515
0 YTD Titles 1
0 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
1 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Nagal VS Mensik H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-5 6-2
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Jakub Mensik
67% ( 52 of 78)
1st Serve %
51% ( 35 of 68)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
60% ( 31 of 52)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 12 of 33)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
42% ( 33 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 34 of 68)
79
Total Points Won
67

Nagal VS Mensik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Nagal Vs Mensik H2H Stats
Sumit Nagal Nagal Stats Jakub Mensik Mensik
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
13 Games Won 7
1 Aces (Total) 3
5 Total Double Faults 7
1:45:44 Average Match Time 1:45:44
67% (52/78) 1st Serve % 51% (35/68)
60% (31/52) 1st Serve Win % 63% (22/35)
54% (14/26) 2nd Serve Win % 36% (12/33)
63% (5/8) Break Points Won % (Total) 22% (2/9)
50% (34/68) Return Points Win % 42% (33/78)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Sumit Nagal vs Jakub Mensik Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Mensik

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 42.59% of points on their second serve, while Mensik has won 48.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 45.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mensik has won 45.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.98% and 22.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 52.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mensik has saved 58.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 42% of matches played (W/L 21/ 29), with Mensik winning 58.82% (W/L 40/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 232/ 140), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 70/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Mensik has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Mensik being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Mensik winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Mensik was at the Helsinki Challenger, 08-11-2023, Second, I.hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:44.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Mensik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Mensik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Mensik 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.12 while Mensik has played against players with an average rank of 88.81.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mensik has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 34.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mensik has converted 26.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Filip Misolic
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 16 of 23)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    38% ( 6 of 16)
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    38% ( 12 of 32)
    Rtn Points Won
    65% ( 15 of 23)
    35
    Total Points Won
    20
    L
    6-2 1-0 ret. H2H
    QF
    cross
    Sumit Nagal
    Player
    Federico Iannaccone
    78% ( 40 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 30 of 51)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    75% ( 30 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 17 of 30)
    82% ( 9 of 11)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    24% ( 12 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 24 of 51)
    63
    Total Points Won
    39
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sumit Nagal
    Player
    Ergi Kirkin
    70% ( 74 of 105)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 82 of 124)
    0
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    62% ( 46 of 74)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 46 of 82)
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 17 of 42)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    40% ( 42 of 105)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 61 of 124)
    124
    Total Points Won
    105
    W
    5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Kamil Majchrzak
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    63% ( 36 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 47 of 71)
    5
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    78% ( 28 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 30 of 47)
    57% ( 12 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 7 of 24)
    22% ( 4 of 18)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    30% ( 17 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 34 of 71)
    74
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    7-5 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sumit Nagal
    Player
    Amine Jamji
    64% ( 32 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    50% ( 30 of 60)
    1
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    75% ( 24 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 19 of 30)
    67% ( 12 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 10 of 30)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    28% ( 14 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 31 of 60)
    67
    Total Points Won
    43
    W
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Luciano Darderi
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    50% ( 19 of 38)
    1st Serve %
    84% ( 27 of 32)
    3
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    89% ( 17 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    37% ( 10 of 27)
    63% ( 12 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    0% ( 0 of 5)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 9 of 38)
    Rtn Points Won
    69% ( 22 of 32)
    51
    Total Points Won
    19
    L
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Sumit Nagal
    Player
    Duje Ajdukovic
    68% ( 44 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 45 of 75)
    1
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    80% ( 35 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 33 of 45)
    62% ( 13 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 14 of 30)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    26% ( 17 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 28 of 75)
    76
    Total Points Won
    64
    W
    7-6(6) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Pablo Llamas Ruiz
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    75% ( 40 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    80% ( 41 of 51)
    3
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    68% ( 27 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    49% ( 20 of 41)
    54% ( 7 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    36% ( 19 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 27 of 51)
    61
    Total Points Won
    43
    L
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Corentin Moutet
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    75% ( 52 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 51 of 80)
    4
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    63% ( 33 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 33 of 51)
    53% ( 9 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 8 of 29)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    39% ( 27 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 39 of 80)
    81
    Total Points Won
    68
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Juan Manuel Cerundolo
    Player
    Sumit Nagal
    73% ( 54 of 74)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 56 of 87)
    2
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 36 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 39 of 56)
    50% ( 10 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    38% ( 28 of 74)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 30 of 87)
    76
    Total Points Won
    85
    L
    3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. H2H

    Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Yannick Hanfmann
    Player
    Jakub Mensik
    67% ( 73 of 109)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 48 of 94)
    8
    Aces
    13
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    68% ( 50 of 73)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 36 of 48)
    58% ( 21 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 25 of 46)
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    35% ( 38 of 109)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 33 of 94)
    104
    Total Points Won
    99
    L
    7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 H2H
    F
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Novak Djokovic
    67% ( 52 of 78)
    1st Serve %
    76% ( 56 of 74)
    14
    Aces
    7
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 40 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    77% ( 43 of 56)
    54% ( 14 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 9 of 18)
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    31% ( 24 of 78)
    Rtn Points Won
    30% ( 22 of 74)
    76
    Total Points Won
    76
    W
    7-6(4) 7-6(4) H2H
    SF
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Taylor Fritz
    72% ( 73 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 79 of 114)
    25
    Aces
    14
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    82% ( 60 of 73)
    1st Serve Won
    80% ( 63 of 79)
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 16 of 35)
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    26% ( 26 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    31% ( 35 of 114)
    110
    Total Points Won
    105
    W
    7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Arthur Fils
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 47 of 69)
    13
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    86% ( 30 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 33 of 47)
    50% ( 9 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    26% ( 14 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 29 of 69)
    68
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    7-6(5) 6-1 H2H
    R4
    W
    w/o H2H
    R3
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Roman Safiullin
    75% ( 41 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 36 of 50)
    15
    Aces
    5
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    88% ( 36 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    81% ( 29 of 36)
    43% ( 6 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 13 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    26% ( 13 of 50)
    55
    Total Points Won
    50
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Jack Draper
    66% ( 50 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 60 of 92)
    21
    Aces
    12
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    86% ( 43 of 50)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 44 of 60)
    54% ( 14 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 17 of 32)
    11% ( 1 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    25% ( 19 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 31 of 92)
    88
    Total Points Won
    80
    W
    7-6(2) 7-6(3) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Roberto Bautista Agut
    66% ( 57 of 86)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 53 of 71)
    23
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    84% ( 48 of 57)
    1st Serve Won
    72% ( 38 of 53)
    31% ( 9 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    13% ( 1 of 8)
    34% ( 29 of 86)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 26 of 71)
    83
    Total Points Won
    74
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-1 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Damir Dzumhur
    Player
    Jakub Mensik
    73% ( 70 of 96)
    1st Serve %
    47% ( 50 of 107)
    0
    Aces
    9
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    64% ( 45 of 70)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 30 of 50)
    69% ( 18 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 33 of 57)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    34% ( 33 of 96)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 44 of 107)
    107
    Total Points Won
    96
    L
    5-7 6-4 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Jakub Mensik
    Player
    Tomas Martin Etcheverry
    60% ( 65 of 109)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 65 of 97)
    6
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    80% ( 52 of 65)
    1st Serve Won
    72% ( 47 of 65)
    55% ( 24 of 44)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 17 of 32)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    30% ( 33 of 109)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 33 of 97)
    109
    Total Points Won
    97
    W
    6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Nagal & Mensik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Sumit Nagal Nagal Stats Jakub Mensik Mensik
    59% (339/233) Win/Loss 63% (133/78)
    58% (773/561) Sets Win/Loss 60% (310/205)
    53% (6537/5748) Games Win/Loss 52% (2592/2349)
    0.13 Aces Per Game 0.68
    782 Aces Total 1648
    0.21 Double Faults Per Game 0.31
    1233 Total Double Faults 755
    1:32:47 Average Match Time 1:46:6
    472.78 Average Opponent Rank 288.21
    68% (23791/35192) 1st Serve % 59% (9135/15549)
    64% (15298/23791) 1st Serve Win % 74% (6792/9135)
    50% (5746/11387) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (3106/6418)
    44% (1844/4176) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (591/1420)
    43% (15480/36169) Return Points Win % 39% (5994/15552)
    60% (330/549) Best of 3 Sets Win % 65% (126/193)
    25% (4/16) Best of 5 Sets Win % 47% (7/15)
    58% (84/145) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 57% (55/96)
    49% (87/178) Deciding Set Win % 56% (39/70)
    84% (354/299) 1st Set Won, Won Match 85% (137/117)
    15% (354/53) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (137/20)
    18% (218/40) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 22% (74/16)

    Other Predictions

    Tallahassee Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...